1. Hoop Stress Measurement at U of M with
  2. EMS4 Chamber

Hoop Stress Measurement at U of M with

 

Hoop Stress Measurement at U of M with

Back to top


EMS4 Chamber

EMS4 Chamber

E. Diehl, D. Levin, H. Schick, R. Thun , C. Weaverdyck ,

H. Schick, B. Zhou , Z.G. Zhao

University of Michigan

? Measurement Setup

? Measurement

? Conclusion

 

Details of the Measurement

Using chamber EMS4C06 ( leak tested chamber)

O ne end of the chamber dimension was measured

• 4 micron - indicators were placed in contacting with the

precision surfaces of the end plugs on the outmost tube

layer of each ML

• Measure the displacement in z direction (perpendicular to

tube axis and parallel to plane of the chamber)

• Pressurized to slightly over 3 bar in about 50 min.; waited

for ~2 hours for the chamber gas to be equilibrated

• Measurement was done by mounting chamber horizontally

and vertically on our chamber cart.

 

3 T sensors for

each multilayer

Strips

Indicators

Indicators for

Short tube side

T sensor

Indicator on ML1 long tube side

Vertical Setup Measurement

 

T sensors at long

tube sides

Indicators

Indicators

3 T sensors for each ML

Al strips

ML1(no strips)

Horizontal Setup Measurement

 

Conclusion :

The total chamber dimension

expansion in z direction when

pressurized at 47.5 PSI is at a

level of 20 m m with an error of

about 10 m m

Both vertical and horizontal

setups are consistent.

The expansion difference

between ML1 and ML2 is

within 10 m m .

No need to glue Al strips on

ML1

Results and Conclusion

20.2

20.4

20.6

20.8

21

21.2

21.4

21.6

0 50 100 150 200 250

Time (minute)

Temperature (C^0)

ML1

ML2

Start pressurizing

Temperature vs Time

ML1

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 50 100 150 200 250

Time(minute)

Expansion (micrometer) or

Chamber Pressure(PSI)

Pressure

ML2

Start pressurizing

Expansion/Pressure vs Time

Back to top