THE UM-ATLAS COLLABORATORY PROJECT
24 March 1999
Homer A. Neal
University of Michigan Table of Contents
I
NTRODUCTION
3
T
HE
P
ROBLEMS TO BE
A
DDRESSED AND THE
I
NTELLECTUAL
C
HALLENGES
4
Collaborative tools for research education 4
Effective collaboration for globally dispersed researchers 5
Infrastructure development 5
W
HY THE
U
NIVERSITY OF
M
ICHIGAN?
5
The School of Information 6
The College of Engineering
6 UCAID-Internet2
6
The ATLAS Experiment - the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Projects First
Collaboratory 7
UM-ATLAS COLLABORATORY
P
ROJECT
A
CTIVITIES TO
D
ATE
7
Site Visits 7
Connections with Federal Agencies and Congress 8
Research Experiences for Undergraduates at CERN 8
A
FFILIATED
C
OLLABORATORS
8
P
ROPOSED
P
ROGRAM FOR THE
C
OMING
Y
EAR
9
Video Conferencing Laboratories
9
Collaborative Tools for Work Groups 9
Improved International Networking
9 F
UTURE
P
LANS
10
P
ROPOSED
G
OVERNANCE
S
TRUCTURE
11
R
EFERENCES
12
I
NTRODUCTION
This document provides an update on the activities and plans of the University
of Michigan ATLAS Collaboratory Project, a novel interdisciplinary program
initially authorized by the University in February 1997. The goal of the
Project is to study and advance the technologies and practices required for the
organization and execution of modern, large-scale collaborative research
experiments.
The need for studies of collaboratories, and for optimizing their
functioning, has emerged from the growing need in many disciplines for the
simultaneous, active involvement of a large number of geographically separated
investigators in the conduct of key research and development projects. These
scientists are often unified by a shared desire to achieve a certain major
research objective under the constrained circumstances of the need for access
to a one-of-a-kind instrument or facility, or by the overwhelming size and
complexity of the task being undertaken.
In fields requiring such approaches, the mushrooming of the number of
participants and the increasing remoteness of specialized facilities might be
regarded as a natural evolution in the way scientists must organize themselves
to achieve common goals. But, while there is considerable reason for elation
that we still have the technological ingenuity for pursuing large scale
collaborative studies of this type, it should be noted that there are potential
downsides for the system of higher education we have watched perform so well
in the past. Specifically, we must ask what these new modalities for carrying
out research do to the interactions between undergraduate students, their
professors, graduate students, teaching assistants and postdocs.
At the very time the public is expressing increasing concern about the amount
of time faculty spend off-campus, often at remote research facilities, many
faculty in truly large collaborations are finding that they need to spend even
more time away. This has an obvious impact on the time faculty can effectively
devote to their undergraduate teaching responsibilities. Graduate education is
also affected, with many graduate students finding themselves needing to be on
campus (to take courses, act as teaching assistants, etc.) at the very time
significant decisions and studies that will form the basis for their thesis
work are being conducted at a distant site.
It would be disastrous if these trends resulted in the disengagement of
university faculty and students from frontier research, or if they were allowed
to rupture the traditional bonds between undergraduate education and graduate
education.
We assert that the very expanding technology which makes possible new studies
of challenging problems in the physical, biological and social sciences, should
be harnessed to help preserve those key elements of higher education being
threatened by the new reach those technologies are giving the disciplines in
the first place. Restated, we ask: what are the collaborative tools made
possible by new technologies that will reduce the demands on faculty to be away
from campus, and that will facilitate the full remote participation of faculty
and their students in all aspects of their research?
It is not suggested that the need for the physical presence of faculty and
students at an experimental site will be eliminated. Rather, the goal is to
preserve those instances of on-site presence for occasions truly requiring such
presence, and to greatly expand the possibilities for meaningful contact and
interaction with the experiment via remote means.
Were these issues to affect only one discipline, it might be argued that it is
the responsibility of that discipline to seek whatever remedies are required.
But the fact is that today there are more and more fields being presented with
the same set of problems associated with collaborative research. Thus, although
it was the changing paradigms of the field of high energy physics, and issues
presented to the UM high energy physics group as it moves to play a major role
in the 2000-person ATLAS Experiment that was the primary motivation for the
formation of the current study, there are many examples from other fields that
reflect the same challenges.
Before describing the ATLAS Experiment in some detail, it is instructive to
consider a few other examples. One example of current large collaborations is
the Human Genome Project, a 15-year effort formally begun in October 1990 to
discover all the 60,000 to 80,000 human genes (the human genome) and make them
accessible for further biological study. In the United States, there are more
than 30 institutions receiving federal funding to work on the project.
Internationally, about 1000 individuals from 50 countries are members of HUGO,
which helps to coordinate international collaboration in the Genome Project.
Even without describing any detail, it is readily understood that the task of
managing the activities of so many organizations requires sophisticated tools
for communication and organization.
The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory (UARC) is another very important
example of the iterative development of collaborative technology. Through UARC
technology, atmospheric scientists around the world study a set of scientific
and environmental issues in a collaborative setting. Early versions of the
collaboratory technology permitted access for only a limited number of users
(less than 12), but improvements have increased the capacity to over 50
participants, at sites ranging from Alaska to the former Soviet Union. During
what are called campaigns, scientists located all over the planet work with
data being collected at sites around the northern hemisphere from the
Sondestrom facility in Greenland to EISCAT in Norway, to Millstone in
Massachusetts, and through an array of high-frequency radar sites across Canada
as well as from two satellites orbiting Earth.
We believe that UM is singularly well suited to carry out the studies proposed
by the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project. UM is one of the largest and most
comprehensive research universities in the U.S., and one of only a handful of
universities with targeted programs in collaboratory studies. UM is also
nationally recognized as one of the most innovative in linking undergraduate
education and research (RAIRE Award), and one with faculty talent that has
demonstrated its capability to develop nationwide internets (NSFNET) and
Internet browsers (Mosaic). The UM is closely affiliated with consortia
designed to develop the next generation Internet (UCAID-Internet2, ALLIANCE).
Finally, the fact that we are engaging the challenges of collaboratory studies
at CERN where the World Wide Web was first developed positions us
to carry out the planned R/D in an almost ideal setting.
Presented below are descriptions of the initial proposed set of research
topics, a review of the preparations underway, and a presentation of the
organizational and governance structure for the project. In addition, the
problems that will be ameliorated by the use of emerging technologies in
computer networking and human factor studies will also be described, with
particular reference to the areas where the University of Michigan is
positioned to make extraordinary contributions.
THE
P
ROBLEMS TO BE
A
DDRESSED AND THE I
NTELLECTUAL
C
HALLENGES
The research problems to be addressed by the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project
fall into three categories: collaborative tools that enrich undergraduate and
graduate education, technologies that enable globally dispersed scientists to
work together seamlessly, and last, facilitation of the network enhancements
necessary for the first two foci to become a reality.
Collaborative tools for enrichment of educational experiences
There are emerging technologies and collaborative tools that can be applied to
expand, develop and enrich interactions between students and their non
co-located mentors. For instance, graduate students in a research group should
have high quality video links with their faculty advisors on a daily basis.
Undergraduate students should be able to follow the work of their summer
faculty mentors all year long, perhaps even sitting in on weekly meetings via
video-links. These same tools could be used to promote outreach to students who
might otherwise never have an opportunity to interact with a large
international research project. Through the development of better distance
learning tools, students will not only maintain access to the faculty who are
conducting research at a distant laboratory, but they will be given an
opportunity to interact with the ongoing research project in a way not
currently possible.
Some key R/D issues in this realm include the development of a set of hardware
and applications toolkits and related protocols supportive of mentoring
communications between students and faculty members. This will require input
from experts working on conferencing packages, application sharing, whiteboard
systems, human factor analyses, as well as networking quality and reliability.
The new quality of service protocols will be evaluated for their
impact on the improvement of conferencing activities.
Given the interest of the University of Michigan Media Union in the topic of
how technology can be used in support of education, we expect it will play the
lead role in carrying out this research.
Effective collaboration for globally dispersed researchers
The second area of research for the Project seeks to identify or develop
technologies that permit collaborating scientists to more effectively work
together on projects in a dispersed, global setting. Virtual offices should
make it almost impossible for, say, three occupants in Geneva and three in Ann
Arbor to determine who is where; each should feel like one of six people in one
office. Work within the Project, to design and test collaboratory tools that
make communication seamless, and to literally eliminate all significant
differences between local and remote classifications, will benefit an enormous
constituency throughout science and industry. Even within a single field, the
impact will embrace not only the facilitation of the traditional meetings
required to manage a large project, but the development of tools that enable
discovery and discussion of scientific results between non co-located research
scientists as the results from the experiments are streaming in.
An example of an R/D subject in this area is the further development of the
shared application tool WIRED for which the School of Information
has received a license from CERN to examine and extend. This package permits
remotely located researchers to jointly view, discuss and manipulate
three-dimensional images in a collaborative setting.
Infrastructure development
In the third focus, the Project will engage in the development, along with
other partners, of the infrastructure necessary for the next generation of
scientific investigations. By addressing the weaknesses in the current
infrastructure (e.g., in global network communications), all areas, not just
those devoted to scientific collaboration, will benefit. Clearly, one area that
deserves special attention, as we move into increased international
collaboration, is the improvement of data links to Europe, and of systems that
will provide dedicated bandwidth for designated activities.
An example of a R/D effort in this category would be the tracking of
improvements in videoconferencing achievable through the use of the new
quality-of-service protocols. This is currently being pursued in
discussions with UCAID-INTERNET2 and MERIT.
The above represent important problems for which current technology has not
provided adequate answers. A focussed effort to describe the need, to apply
existing technology, and to extend technology where needed, can have a
significant impact in addressing the remote collaboration issues we have
identified.
W
HY THE U
NIVERSITY OF
M
ICHIGAN?
Ideally, an institution that dares to pioneer in the use of technology to
foster the collaborative research of faculty and students should have certain
characteristics. It should have a large and diverse set of research programs,
encompassing both those which are traditional in nature and located on-campus,
as well as those in the physical, social, medical and other sciences that have
a strong globally distributed component. It should have faculty who are experts
on the operation and management of computing networks, with strong ties to
every major network improvement effort in the world. It should have access to a
set of its researchers who are willing to be used as subjects in
the development of new protocols and new technologies. Finally, it should have
a demonstrated commitment to improvements in undergraduate and graduate
education. These characteristics almost uniquely identify the University of
Michigan, and highlight why we believe our university must play a major role in
this area.
It is difficult to think of any other university in the nation with such a set
of relevant linkages and expertise.
Though many examples could be given to further emphasize why we believe that
the University of Michigan should be the locus of the proposed research and
development, we cite below just four examples. We note the activities of our
new School of Information, expertise and facilities in the College of
Engineering, the close ties between UM and UCAID-Internet2, and the
participation of the Physics Department in the ATLAS Experiment.
The School of Information
All of the components that have been described thus far in this paper as
necessary for a modern, large-scale research program on
collaboratories are integrated and studied at the School of Information
(SI), a modern, interdisciplinary school offering a holistic view of
information systems. At SI, researchers in organizational and cognitive
psychology, computer science, economics, sociology, library science and
information studies come together to pursue the issues of modern knowledge
environments. As mentioned above, a major collaboratory initiative of the
School of Information is the UARC Project (its successor is SPARC
1
). UARC successfully demonstrates how modern collaboratory tools can transform
the modus operandi within a science domain, providing for capabilities in
global-scale experimental work and in rigorous data-theory comparisons that
simply did not exist prior to the project. Over a six-year period, a team of
space physicists, computer scientists, and behavioral scientists evolved a
suite of collaboration capabilities providing rich, real-time access to a wide
variety of data and modeling resources. Now, the SPARC project will
significantly extend the power of technology-mediated, distributed
knowledge-networking systems. It combines experimental data streams and their
interpretation, theoretical models, real-time campaign support, capture
mid-replay of collaborative sessions, post-hoc analysis workshops, access to
archival data and digital libraries, and educational/outreach modules. An
important outcome of SPARC for the science community will be a functional and
ope
rational space weather predictive capability. Equally important, SPARC will be
a major test-bed to further understand and design collaborative knowledge work
systems from a merger of social and technical principles.
The College of Engineering
At the University of Michigan, the College of Engineering is a member of the
National Partnership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure (NPACI), which
is building the nation's computation infrastructure. NPACI provides a
distributed, national metacomputing infrastructure that enables data-intensive
computing. This extraordinary resource permits us to explore issues associated
with the management of large data sets in a regional setting. Questions such as
how to acquire and maintain updated images of data produced at the core remote
facility and how to share those data with other universities in the local
region, will be of increasing relevance in the future.
UCAID-Internet2
Internet2, a project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet
Development (UCAID), is led by over 135 top U.S. universities (including the
University of Michigan), over 30 non-profit affiliates, and a growing list of
international organizations with similar missions. The UCAID participants are
developing broadband applications, as well as engineering and network
management tools, for research and education. They are working with industry
and government to enable and facilitate the advanced network applications
necessary to meet emerging needs in higher education, including international
connectivity. The UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project expects to be closely involved
with UCAID in conducting research and development on several topics of shared
interest, as will be explained below.
The ATLAS Experiment - the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Projects First
Collaboratory
The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Laboratorys primary
goal for the next decade is the construction and operation of the Large Hadron
Collider (LHC), the highest energy particle accelerator ever built. It will
serve as a precise and powerful instrument for probing matter at the deepest
levels, and will elucidate such concepts as the origin of mass, and the
fundamental nature of the basic building blocks of matter and the forces by
which they interact. A major LHC experiment, ATLAS, in which the UM Department
of Physics is playing a key role, both demonstrates the need for high quality
collaboratory tools, and serves as a test-bed for some of the ideas that will
emerge from the Project. (This is why the term ATLAS has been used
as a temporary placeholder in the title of the collaboratory project.) The
second major LHC experiment is the CMS Experiment. Although competitors, ATLAS
and CMS cooperate on various technical challenges, such as the development and
effective use of collaborative tools.
The ATLAS Experiment is a worldwide, 2000 member, high energy physics program.
The Michigan faculty group includes Robert Ball, Jay Chapman, David Gerdes,
Homer Neal, Jianming Qian, Greg Tarle, Rudi Thun and Bing Zhou. UM is proud to
have one of the largest institutional groups represented in the entire
collaboration. These Michigan faculty are playing a major role in the
experiment by designing, prototyping, testing, and constructing (in Ann Arbor),
a significant part of a 90,000 component muon forward spectrometer. The UM
group is also overseeing the design and construction of the trigger electronics
for the muon system, and will work on various components of the computing
system for the full experiment.
These responsibilities will require a massive amount of activity over the next
seven years, both in Ann Arbor and at CERN. On any given occasion there will be
UM ATLAS faculty, students and staff in Ann Arbor and UM ATLAS faculty,
students and staff at CERN. Daily communication must take place between these
groups and between these groups and their collaborators around the world.
As an aside, the LHC project in Geneva is an outgrowth of the failed U.S.
Superconducting Super Collider Project proposed for Dallas, Texas, and
cancelled in 1993. In commenting on the demise of that project, the United
States Congress noted that all future basic research projects of this scale
should be international in scope. That is, the design, siting and funding for
such facilities must be managed by an international entity. A fairly
straightforward interpretation of this statement is that a smaller and smaller
fraction of large research facilities will be located in the U.S. This fact
provides additional urgency to studies of how collaborative tools can be
optimally utilized.
UM-ATLAS C
OLLABORATORY
P
ROJECT A
CTIVITIES TO
D
ATE
This past year of the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project has been devoted to
building relationships and connecting the groups that will be necessary both
for the collaborative research to be conducted effectively, and for locating
the necessary international expertise required to carry out the Project goals.
Site Visits
Researchers from the School of Information visited CERN in the fall of 1997.
During the visit, they met with ATLAS and other LHC physicists, support
personnel for the videoconferencing and web-based tools used in ATLAS and CMS,
as well as members of the CERN Web Office, who hosted the visit. Following that
visit, a series of bi-weekly web and video conferences have been held between
CERN and SI. Recently these meetings have been expanded to include scientists
from the CMS Experiment, researchers from Argonne National Laboratory and
colleagues from Internet2.
Dr. Douglas Van Houweling, President and CEO of UCAID, visited CERN in the
summer of 1998 to hold a series of discussions with CERN scientists concerning
ways in which UCAID and CERN might cooperate in meeting the networking needs
for U.S. universities associated with the LHC experiments. Those discussions
are ongoing and it is likely that CERN will become an official member (and the
only international member) of UCAID. This would greatly benefit not only the
collaboratory R/D activities described above, but the very accessibility of
CERN physics data that will be needed by the UM physicists.
Connections with Federal Agencies and Congress
Bridges have also been built to Washington, where it has been important to
inform Congressional leaders of the impact that large-scale international
science will have on higher education. Professor Neal was invited to deliver
testimony to the House Science Committee on International Science and, in March
1998, used the opportunity to stress the necessity for deploying collaboratory
tools in the execution of large-scale international science projects. Over the
past year, Dr. Neal has also had meetings with officials from the Department
of Energy and the National Science Foundation to discuss the importance of
developing the collaborative tools that will make large scale international
scientific projects feasible.
Research Experiences for Undergraduates at CERN
In adding to the list of Michigans leadership activities that involve
linking research with undergraduate education, we note the successful National
Science Foundation REU Program which was introduced by the NSF in 1987
following the recommendation of the Neal Commission of the National Science
Board. The Commission noted the very important benefits to be derived by having
undergraduates, during the summer, work on actual scientific projects under
the mentorship of distinguished faculty.
Homer Neal of Michigan and Steve Reucroft of Northeastern University launched a
new program in the summer of 1998. It creates the first international
component for the NSF REU. Each summer, ten students travel to CERN to spend
twelve weeks working on the LHC experiments, ATLAS and CMS.
This REU provides an opportunity for the brightest undergraduates from around
the United States to discover the excitement of international high energy
physics. Although CERN has had a summer program for four decades, it was not
open to U.S. students until now. This proved to be an outstanding opportunity
for a select group of U.S. undergraduates last year, and student selection for
summer 1999 is now underway. Two main ingredients of the program include
joining the day-to-day activities of CERN research groups, and attending a
lecture series on a wide range of topics in theoretical and experimental
particle physics and associated techniques. Finally, the students have ample
opportunity to interact socially with the large and eclectic international
community found at CERN.
We note that it is our intention to have these students participate in the
collaboratory R/D programs developed within the Project. A
FFI
LIATED
C
OLLABORATORS
UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project participants come from the following categories:
P
ROPOSED P
ROGRAM FOR THE
C
OMING Y
EAR
During the next twelve months, the ATLAS Project will initiate its first
long-term studies of the key issues relevant to the success of global high
energy physics collaborations, in the setting of the CERN Large Hadron Collider
experiments. This work will encompass the scientific observation of several
working groups within the ATLAS Experiment, the evaluation of both the relevant
human factors issues, as well as the tracking and evaluation of relevant
emerging hardware and software technologies. Also, the networking deficiencies
that continue to be a barrier to effecting global communication will be
addressed through partnerships with external organizations and industrial
partners. Video Conferencing Laboratories
Researchers from the School of Information will begin the task of outfitting
Video Conferencing Laboratories one at CERN and one at the University of
Michigan. These laboratories will be designed and equipped with state of the
art technology. While they are being used for regular meetings of physics
researchers going about their routine experimental tasks, behavioral
researchers and their graduate students will study the scientific interactions
of those physicists. There will be technical researchers to evaluate the
facility design, with the goal of iteratively enhancing the facilities as needs
require. These rooms will also be used to test faculty-student interactions
via video conference technology.
Collaborative Tools for Work Groups
As previously mentioned, not all interactions are full-scale meetings;
cooperative efforts between scientists on- and off-site in planning and
evaluation activities can be just as critical. Thus, another facet of the
project will involve technologies for workgroup collaboration. Using
Internet-based collaboration tools such as WIRED, as well as other tools
developed by SI, the interdisciplinary team of collaborative tool developers
found at the School of Information will again assess the needs and current
practices of the physicists working on the muon front end electronics. The
lessons learned with this group, and the tools developed, will be deployed more
widely within ATLAS and CMS during the life of the Project.
Another potential workgroup test-bed is the MONARC Project at the CERN LHC. The
approach taken in MONARC is to develop and execute discrete event simulations
of the various candidate distributed computing systems. There are approximately
50 researchers on this project, broken into four working groups, and their
interactions will be evaluated as part of the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project.
Improved International Networking
In order for collaborative technologies to be effective there must be
improvements to networking connections between the U.S. and Europe. This is not
only important for the project at CERN, but for all global communications.
Faculty from the College of Engineering, the School of Information, and
colleagues from UCAID-Internet2 and CalTech, will continue to work together to
develop the best possible connections with Europe. They will also track the
impact and opportunities provided by the new quality of service
technology, which allows the assignment of priorities to individual network
packets.
F
UTURE P
LANS
Although the initial efforts of the UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project are to be
focussed on experimental high energy physics, and the ATLAS Experiment in
particular, lessons learned from work in this area will be applied to other
developing large-scale collaborations. In particular, those with an
international component, where the struggle to meet global communications
challenges will be critical, will benefit greatly from efforts to improve
connectivity across national boundaries. As the anticipated success in this
first collaboratory is reported, the Project hopes to be a valuable resource to
other programs on campus, providing the necessary structure for these research
endeavors to be successful.
There are several items for possible longer term research that are under
current consideration. They will be discussed and evaluated in the context of
the work of the new advisory committee, which is described below.
In the interim, efforts are underway to secure planning funds from the NSF
Knowledge and Distributed Intelligence (KDI) Office, and from the U.S.
Department of Energy.
P
ROPOSED G
OVERNANCE
S
TRUCTURE
The UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project reports to the Provost of the University of
Michigan, through its current Director, Homer A. Neal. The Project has been
given support and space by the School of Information. It will be advised by an
advisory committee comprised of knowledgeable individuals from a variety of
disciplines at the University of Michigan.
The structural components of an initial organizational chart are presented
below.
UM-ATLAS C
OLLABORATORY
P
ROJECT
R
EFERENCES
A CERN Invention You are Familiar With: The World Wide Web. CERN Web Office
http://www.cern.ch/Public/ACHIEVEMENTS/web.html
.
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).
http://www.cern.ch
.
Human Genome Project Information.
http://www.ornl.gov/TechResources/Human_Genome/home.html
.
The Large Hadron Collider Project at CERN.
http://wwwlhc01.cern.ch/.
National Partnership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure.
http://www.npaci.edu/
.
Neal, Homer A. Testimony Delivered to the House Science Committee Hearing on
International Science. March 25, 1998.
http://www.house.gov/science/neal_03-25.htm
.
Publications and Reports of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy
of Engineering, Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council.
http://www.nas.edu/publications/
.
Research and Scholarly Activities, FY 1998 - DISCIPLINES AND INTERSECTIONS.
Report to the Regents by Frederick Neidhardt, Vice President for Research,
University of Michigan, November 19, 1998.
http://www.research.umich.edu/research/research_guide/annual_reports/FY98/Inter
sections.html
.
Space Physics and Aeronomy Research Collaboratory (SPARC). Collaboratory for
Research on Electronic Work, University of Michigan.
http://www.crew.umich.edu/UARC/
.
Summer Research Experience at CERN.
http://www.dac.neu.edu/physics.reu_cern/
.
The Superconducting Super Collider History. The High Energy Physics
Information Center:
http://www.hep.net/ssc/new/history/
.
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development-Internet2.
http://www.internet2.org.
University of Michigan Recognition Award for Integration of Research and
Education (RAIRE).
http://www.research.umich.edu/research/UG_research/homeraire.html.
Unlocking Our Future. Toward a New National Science Policy. A
Report to Congress by the House Committee on Science. September 24, 1998.
http://www.house.gov/science/science_policy_report.htm
.
WIRED: The World Wide Web Interactive Remote Event Display.
http://wired.cern.ch/
.
5
UM-ATLAS Collaboratory Project

